Teaching

December 26, 2009

A young physician in Tokyo named Kusuda met a college friend who had been studying Zen. The young doctor asked him what Zen was.

“I cannot tell you what it is,” the friend replied, “but one thing is certain. If you understand Zen, you will not be afraid to die.”

“That’s fine,” said Kusuda. “I will try it. Where can I find a teacher?”

“Go to the master Nan-in,” the friend told him.

So Kusuda went to call on Nan-in. He carried a dagger nine and a half inches long to determine whether or not the teacher was afraid to die.

When Nan-in saw Kusuda he exclaimed: “Hello, friend. How are you? We haven’t seen each other for a long time!”

This perplexed Kusuda, who replied: “We have never met before.”

“That’s right,” answered Nan-in. “I mistook you for another physician who is receiving instruction here.”

With such a beginning, Kusuda lost his chance to test the master, so reluctantly he asked if he might receive Zen instruction.

Nan-in said: “Zen is not a difficult task. If you are a physician, treat you patients with kindness. That is Zen.”

Kusuda visited Nan-in three times. Each time Nan-in told him the same thing. “A physician should not waste time around here. Go home and take care of you patients.”

It was not yet clear to Kusuda how such teaching could remove the fear of death. So on his fourth visit he complained: “My friend told me when one learns Zen one loses the fear of death. Each time I come here all you tell me is to take care of my patients. I know that much. If that is your so-called Zen, I am not going to visit you any more.”

Nan-in smiled and patted the doctor. “I have been too strict with you. Let me give you a koan.” He presented Kusuda with Joshu’s Mu to work over, which is the first mind enlightening problem in the book called The Gateless Gate.

Kusuda pondered this problem of Mu (No-Thing) for two years. At length he thought he had reached certainty of mind. But his teacher commented: “You are not in yet.”

Kusuda continued in concentration for another year and a half. His mind became placid. Problems dissolved. No-Thing became the truth. He served his patients well and, without even knowing it, he was free from concern over life and death.

Then when he visited Nan-in, his old teacher just smiled.

Love Openly

December 25, 2009

Twenty monks and one nun, who was named Eshun, were practicing meditation with a certain Zen master.

Eshun was very pretty even though her head was shaved and her dress plain. Several monks secretly fell in love with her. One of them wrote her a love letter, insisting upon a private meeting.

Eshun did not reply. The following day the master gave a lecture to the group, and when it was over, Eshun arose. Addressing the one who had written her, she said: “If you really love me so much, come and embrace me now.”

Equanimity

December 24, 2009

On a visit to the East Coast, Suzuki Roshi arrived at the meeting place of the Cambridge Buddhist Society to find everyone scrubbing down the interior in anticipation of his visit. They were surprised to see him, because he had written that he would arrive on the following day. He tied back the sleeves of his robe and insisted on joining the preparations “for the grand day of my arrival.”

Brother

December 23, 2009

When Bankei held his seclusion-weeks of meditation, pupils from many parts of Japan came to attend. During one of these gatherings a pupil was caught stealing. The matter was reported to Bankei with the request that the culprit be expelled. Bankei ignored the case.

Later the pupil was caught in a similar act, and again Bankei disregarded the matter. This angered the other pupils, who drew up a petition asking for the dismissal of the thief, stating that otherwise they would leave in a body.

When Bankei had read the petition he called everyone before him. “You are wise brothers,” he told them. “You know what is right and what is not right. You may go somewhere else to study if you wish, but this poor brother does not even know right from wrong. Who will teach him if I do not? I am going to keep him here even if all the rest of you leave.”

A torrent of tears cleansed the face of the brother who had stolen. All desire to steal had vanished.

Belief

December 22, 2009

One day Mara, the Evil One, was travelling through the villages of India with his attendants. He saw a man doing walking meditation whose face was lit up on wonder. The man had just discovered something on the ground in front of him. Mara’s attendant asked what that was and Mara replied, “A piece of truth.”

“Doesn’t this bother you when someone finds a piece of truth, O Evil One?” his attendant asked.

“No,” Mara replied. “Right after this, they usually make a belief out of it.”

At the beginning of the month I read this article in The Guardian newpaper, written by the infamous Derren Brown, concerning the notion of good will… With the festive season fast approaching, I felt that it was a good idea to bring these wise words to the attention of any good souls who may be visiting these pages, so that we may meditate upon and inspire good will in others, regardless of season or timing.

A Challenge For All Our Seasons

I have at home a box of old teeth. These are arranged by colour upon a wheel: unnaturally white through familiar cream, through the tobacco stains of yellow and brown to the foulest greens and grey that are hard to imagine in the mouth of any living creature. They constitute a dentist’s guide to colour-matching, and accompanying the grisly colour-wheel are some small medical bottles, hoses and other whatnots.

The box dates back to the 1950s and was given to me as a Christmas gift shortly after its original owner died. As I have no practical need for dental tint-comparisons, the wooden case sits on display among various oddities that I have collected since being a student: taxidermy, pickled animals and amusing quack remedies line my shelves as an effective deterrent against any unwanted sexual attention.

Having known the dentist a little, and having a real fondness for his memory, it sometimes feels like a shame to me that this box, which was not long ago brought out every day by a noble and dedicated man to fit his patients with synthetic teeth in order to improve their lives and self-respect, regardless of the malodorous depths of dental hygiene to which they had neglectfully plunged, is now a mere droll oddity on a shelf. It is displayed for purely aesthetic value, its new owner ignorant of the precise use of the numerous pipes and pipettes. It has, in a sense, lost its bite. Such collections of unusual surgical and natural history paraphernalia can tread a fine line between fascinating oddness and cheap schlock. I worry sometimes that I am belittling a man’s career to the status of a dusty amusement that I can point out to politely fascinated dinner guests.

Likewise, there hangs in the air something anaemically dissatisfying when people talk about Christmas as being “a time for giving”, or “a time to remember those less fortunate than ourselves”, or any other of the bloodless blandnesses that are vapidly trotted out around this time of year by priests and politicians. Does that not sap the true meaning of Christmas? Are we not missing out on its magnificence and reducing it to the status of a relic on a shelf that we don’t quite know what to do with? Well, perhaps, but there are plenty of historical artefacts better left on quaint display than put to their original uses.

The diluted secular dicta do sound as though they lack force. But the dissatisfying insipidity of these worldly edicts comes from the obviously begged question: should we not give generously and think charitably at all times? And are we at all likely, during the hectic shopping sprees and binge-drinking more commonly associated with the yuletide season, to remember to be nicer to anyone?

We do not, despite the smug assurances of many believers, ultimately get our morality from the Good Book. The Bible contains so many directives and prescriptions for behaviour that range from the beautiful to the rapacious and repugnant; therefore, as Richard Dawkins elegantly points out, we must call upon a different means of deciding what constitutes honour, virtue and integrity, to cherry-pick from its pages the ethical advice we feel we should apply today. That intuitive source must lie elsewhere: it arises societally, and speaks of our nature as co-habiting human beings. To think of being kind at Christmas, then, is not simply to pay lip-service to a watered-down version of what the season “really” means, but rather to remind ourselves of our potential to shine as human beings.

The Victorians spoke much about “open-heartedness” and “benevolence”, and there lingers a tweeness associated with the notion to this day; conversely, Freud’s later legacy has us worried that any act of kindness must come from a selfish or even an aggressive place, where we act kindly only to be loved in return, or to manipulate or control. Meanwhile, we can easily think of flaccid, perpetually exploited people who relentlessly give of themselves to their own detriment, and give compassion a bad name. All told, kindness is not fashionable. We are told by lifestyle gurus that we cannot live productively without Setting Goals and learning How to Get What We Want, as if the key to life is to single-mindedly turn every situation to our own advantage. That’s a revolting mantra, and it misses what makes us successful in so many ways, as well as happiest and most loved.

Successful, because kindness breeds kindness: this latter maxim is part of the bible of persuasion tactics. Do someone a favour and they’ll feel obliged to reciprocate. If you want something from somebody, be sure to give them something first. Happiest, because acting kindly simply makes us feel happy. New cars and houses make us happier for short, bright bursts before we revert to our default level of contentment, and their erstwhile pleasures soon slip by unnoticed in the same way that we quickly stop hearing the sound of air-conditioning in a room. We do not so easily adjust, however, to the pleasure taken from acting altruistically: when we do kind things, we feel good and we continue to do so; our happiness level is raised and that default is set higher. Being nicer makes us happier.

Above all, kindness is that quality that we most like in other people. We try to be clever and witty around clever and witty people, forgetting that we don’t especially like clever and witty people ourselves unless they are also delightful and charming to be with. Attempting needlessly to look and sound like those whom we want to like us, we ignore the fact that we don’t especially like people who share our tastes, unless they also have that quality of loveliness that sets them apart. Worrying greatly about how we should best present ourselves to others, we relentlessly misjudge and try too hard. To simply be generous, open and engaged, on the other hand, is a simple recipe to appear likeable to anyone.

Most people think themselves kind enough, but rather like a magician thinking he is fooling an audience who can see through his tricks, we are the worst judges of the effect we have on others. True, we can mentally point out various kindnesses we have committed and those pleasant aspects of ourselves. Yet by doing so, we ignore the real test cases: how we behave under pressure; how nice we are to people we don’t like; how we deal with other people who seem determined not to live up to our unrealistic expectations. I try to be kind where I can, but I fume and bubble when people let me down, as if they had nothing else to do but to pander fussily to my whimsies. Plato is credited with the saying: “Be kind, for everyone is fighting a great battle.”

To talk secularly of Christmas being a time to remember others, then, does rather anaemically miss the point, but it is certainly as good a time as any other to rise to the challenge of leading a kinder, lovelier life – one that stretches far beyond the encouraged sentimentality of the holiday period.

As ever, the journey is the thing, and should be enjoyed accordingly. To forgive purely because it is nicer to forgive, and to do so when it’s a tough call; to try to speak only kindly of those we know because it is preferable to do so; to enjoy the successes of others because living thus is more enjoyable than the stress of living resentfully: such kind things make us better, lovelier people. And to try to live this way for its own merits, without invoking a supernatural reason for doing so, is to celebrate our humanity and to give kindness back its teeth.

• This is an abridged extract from The Atheist’s Guide to Christmas, edited by Ariane Sherine

by Derren Brown

To find out where I sourced this article from, please click here.

If you are curious and wish to find out more about Derren Brown, please click here.

The Human Ape

December 21, 2009

I really don’t think I need to introduce this idea, as the title says it all… If you want to understand how close we are to our “distant” relatives, then you really should check this out. It’s a pretty amazing documentary to say the least.

But if you just can’t believe it… And you feel very strongly about what Douglas Adams once wrote i.e. “Humans are not proud of their ancestors, and rarely invite them round to dinner.” Then enjoy some time out…

Either way, don’t forget your coccyx!

If you would like to find out more about the National Geographic Channel, then please click here.

The Diamond On The Muddy Road

December 20, 2009

Gudo was the emperor’s teacher of his time. Nevertheless, he used to travel alone as a wandering mendicant. Once when he was on his way to Edo, the cultural and political center of the shogunate, he approached a little village named Takenaka. It was evening and a heavy rain was falling. Gudo was thoroughly wet. His straw sandals were in pieces. At a farmhouse near the village he noticed four or five pairs of sandals in the window and decided to buy some dry ones.

The woman who offered him the sandals, seeing how wet he was, invited him in to remain for the night at her home. Gudo accepted, thanking her. He entered and recited a sutra before the family shrine. He then was introduced to the woman’s mother, and to her children. Observing that the entire family was depressed, Gudo asked what was wrong.

“My husband is a gambler and a drunkard,” the housewife told him. “When he happens to win he drinks and becomes abusive. When he loses he borrows money from others. Sometimes when he becomes thoroughly drunk he does not come home at all. What can I do?”

I will help him,” said Gudo. “Here is some money. Get me a gallon of fine wine and something good to eat. Then you may retire. I will meditate before the shrine.”

When the man of the house returned about midnight, quite drunk, he bellowed: “Hey, wife, I am home. Have you something for me to eat?”

“I have something for you,” said Gudo. “I happened to get caught in the rain and your wife kindly asked me to remain here for the night. In return I have bought some wine and fish, so you might as well have them.”

The man was delighted. He drank the wine at once and laid himself down on the floor. Gudo sat in meditation beside him.

In the morning when the husband awoke he had forgotten about the previous night. “Who are you? Where do you come from?” he asked Gudo, who still was meditating.

“I am Gudo of Kyoto and I am going on to Edo,” replied the Zen master.

The man was utterly ashamed. He apologized profusely to the teacher of his emperor.

Gudo smiled. “Everything in this life is impermanent,” he explained. “Life is very brief. If you keep on gambling and drinking, you will have no time left to accomplish anything else, and you will cause your family to suffer too.”

The perception of the husband awoke as if from a dream. “You are right,” he declared. “How can I ever repay you for this wonderful teaching! Let me see you off and carry your things a little way.”

“If you wish,” assented Gudo.

The two started out. After they had gone three miles Gudo told him to return. “Just another five miles,” he begged Gudo. They continued on.

“You may return now,” suggested Gudo.

“After another ten miles,” the man replied.

“Return now,” said Gudo, when the ten miles had been passed.

“I am going to follow you all the rest of my life,” declared the man.

Modern Zen teachers in Japan spring from the lineage of a famous master who was the successor of Gudo. His name was Mu-nan, the man who never turned back.

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

God

December 19, 2009

Several citizens ran into a hot argument one afternoon about God and all the different religions. No one could agree on a common answer. So they came to the Lord Buddha to find out what exactly God looks like.

The Buddha asked his disciples to get a large and magnificent elephant, along with four blind men. He then brought the blind to the elephant and told them to find out what the elephant would “look” like.

The first blind man touched the elephant’s leg and reported that it “looked” like a pillar. The second blind man touched the elephant’s tummy and said that the elephant was a wall. The third blind man touched the elephant’s ear and said that it was a piece of cloth. The fourth blind man held on to the tail and described the elephant as a piece of rope. And then all of them ran into a hot argument about the “appearance” of an elephant.

So the Buddha asked the citizens: “Each blind man had touched the elephant, but every one of them gives a different description of the animal. Which answer is right?”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.